This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch, fortran] Handling of .and. and .or. expressions


Am 13.06.2018 um 22:46 schrieb Dominique d'Humières:

In addition I don’t understand the associated warning: in short-circuit evaluation ASSOCIATED(m) (or ALLOCATED(m)) does protect m%T to be accessed.

That is the whole point: Fortran does not have short circuit evaluation.
Very many people assume that it does (or that everything is always
evaluated), and this causes latent bugs.

I don’t understand. Short-circuit evaluation is explicitly allowed by the standard.

Also legal are:

Short-circuit evaluation in reverse order, parallel evaluation,
evaluation of both expressions in the order they appear or evaluation
of both expressions in reverse order (I think I have all cases there,
but I may have missed one :-)

The problem is that the user should not depend on it, and
a compiler is free to chose whatever is most suited.

Regards

	Thomas


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]