This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
I also forgot the attachment . ***duuuh*** On 26 February 2017 at 16:01, Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote: > I forgot to switch on 'plain text' mode - apologies > > Paul > > On 26 February 2017 at 15:58, Paul Richard Thomas > <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Dear All, >> >> The title in this PR turned out to be a red herring. The problem is with a procedure being a dummy in a submodule module procedure declaration; most particularly the abreviated form. >> >> The comments in the fix render the patch self-explanatory. >> >> Bootstrapped and regtested on FC23/x86_64 - OK for trunk and a few weeks later 6-branch? >> >> Cheers >> >> Paul >> >> 2017-02-26 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org> >> >> PR fortran/71838 >> * symbol.c (check_conflict): A dummy procedure in a submodule, >> module procedure is not an error. >> (gfc_add_flavor): Ditto. >> >> 2017-02-26 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org> >> >> PR fortran/71838 >> * gfortran.dg/submodule_26.f08 : New test. >> * gfortran.dg/submodule_27.f08 : New test. >> -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein
Attachment:
submit.diff
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |