This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Are complex*16 variables static by default?

From: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at charter dot net>
To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 09:01:09 -0800
Subject: Re: Are complex*16 variables static by default?
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <4acd98cf-3ac5-7dec-7c9e-6457210508d2@informatik.uni-kiel.de> <1ba5bfa9-d2ab-1cc8-8509-91a06ffa4d4e@charter.net> <CAO9iq9EHxEZWbaTHPxexphK9rRvfE7pT_28J0nD1zk-eoW5hmg@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/28/2017 01:11 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
... snip ...
>> I am doubtful LAPACK is thread safe. I think you need to force single thread
>> through execution of those functions.
> 
> Since LAPACK 3.3, all routines are thread safe:
> http://www.netlib.org/lapack/lapack-3.3.0.html
> 
Thanks Janne for this clarification.

Jerry

References:
- Are complex*16 variables static by default?
  - From: Steffen Boerm
- Re: Are complex*16 variables static by default?
  - From: Jerry DeLisle
- Re: Are complex*16 variables static by default?
  - From: Janne Blomqvist

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]