This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: *ping* [Patch, fortran, RFC] Add warning for missing location information


On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 05:11:17PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> 
>  > If something is found, a warning is issued.  I chose not to issue an
>  > error because missing location information does not make a program
>  > invalid.  The patch would cause testsuite regressions for changes
>  > which cause missing location information, which is a good thing because
>  > we want to catch missing locations as soon as they are (potentially)
>  > introduced.
> 
>  > The checking is turned off if CHECKING_P is not defined, so it should
>  > not slow down release compilers.
> 
>  > I used DK_NOTE here, but that is open to discussion.  Maybe it would be
>  > better to define another warning class for this?
> 
> Ping?  Any comments?
> 

I see nothing wrong with the patch.  Have you considered Janus's
questions?  

-- 
Steve


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]