This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch,libgfortran] PR48298 DTIO implementation for Internal Units


On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 08:46:00AM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> 
> Well so much for my hopes. I have done some large loop tests with two strings 
> inside the loop. One is KIND=1 and one is KIND=4.
> 
> I see a 15% slowdown.  My guess is its in the treap search and stack overhead.
> 

I suspect you'll find that the slowdown will depend
on what you are writing into the string.  Try formatting
a REAL(16), which is a software 128-bit floating implementation.

IMHO, a working, complete, implementation of DTIO is worth
any slowdown.  Someone worried about speed can try to 
optimize/change the nascent stack algorithm.

Knuth: "We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97%
of the time: premature optimization is the root of all evil.  Yetr
we should not pass up our opportunities in that critical 3%"

Or http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?MakeItWorkMakeItRightMakeItFast

-- 
Steve


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]