This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, Fortran] Test for implied sequence in structures in common blocks

From: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at charter dot net>
To: Fritz Reese <fritzoreese at gmail dot com>, Jim MacArthur <jim dot macarthur at codethink dot co dot uk>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 07:52:30 -0700
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] Test for implied sequence in structures in common blocks
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <ebfe7141-74b7-3633-e631-7f175a6776b4@codethink.co.uk> <CAE4aFAn1a4S_AjVKdRCHY9UssLFpeUj7GcHxWVxp_Yk7biP66A@mail.gmail.com>

On 09/13/2016 07:33 AM, Fritz Reese wrote:

Jim,

While the test exhibits no particular regression, IMVHO I don't see
any reason not to add it. None of my previous testcases include a
STRUCTURE within a COMMON block so this would certainly tickle some
new code paths, which could expose a future regression.

I'll give this through the weekend or so to see if any official
maintainers have a comment otherwise I wouldn't mind committing it as
trivial.


No problem with the test case being added.

Jerry

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] Test for implied sequence in structures in common blocks
  - From: Fritz Reese

References:
- [Patch, Fortran] Test for implied sequence in structures in common blocks
  - From: Jim MacArthur
- Re: [Patch, Fortran] Test for implied sequence in structures in common blocks
  - From: Fritz Reese

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]