This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix Fortran DO loop fallback
- From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- To: Martin Liška <mliska at suse dot cz>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:23:58 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix Fortran DO loop fallback
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <cover.1467883947.git.mliska@suse.cz> <86a3b430-0282-305b-8796-5a696d53b46a@suse.cz> <9b6e6e1f-b62c-7ea4-1f72-417472fa96e4@redhat.com>
> On Jul 11, 2016, at 7:44 AM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 07/08/2016 08:26 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> Following patch fixes fallout caused by the patch set:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2016-07/msg00097.html
>>
>> Ready after it finished regression tests?
>> Thanks,
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> 0001-Fix-Fortran-DO-loop-fallback.patch
>>
>>
>> From c5dd7ad62f795cce560c7f1bb8767b7ed9298d8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: marxin <mliska@suse.cz>
>> Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 15:51:54 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] Fix Fortran DO loop fallback
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 2016-07-08 Martin Liska <mliska@suse.cz>
>>
>> * gfortran.dg/ldist-1.f90: Update expected dump scan.
>> * gfortran.dg/pr42108.f90: Likewise.
>> * gfortran.dg/vect/pr62283.f: Likewise.
> Shouldn't ldist-1.f90 be scan-tree-dump-not? It seems like you change it from that just last week, but it wasn't mentioned in the ChangeLog.
>
> OK with that change.
A gentle reminder, fortran patches should include the fortran list...