This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [openacc] fortran loop clauses and splitting
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Cesar Philippidis <cesar at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Thomas Schwinge <thomas at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 09:33:42 +0100
- Subject: Re: [openacc] fortran loop clauses and splitting
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <565C8EA6 dot 1040604 at codesourcery dot com>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:00:06AM -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> This patch contains the following bug fixes:
>
> * Teaches gfortran to accept both num and static gang arguments inside
> same clause. E.g. gang(num:10, static:30). Currently, gfortran only
> allows one of those arguments to appear in a gang clause.
>
> * Make the diagnostics reported by resovle_oacc_positive_int_expr more
> accurate for worker and vector clauses.
>
> * Updates how combined loops are split to account for the renamed gang
> clause members in gfc_omp_clauses. Also corrected a bug that Tom
> discovered in the c front end where combined reductions were being
> attached to kernels and parallel constructs. Now, they are only
> associated with the split acc loop.
>
> Is this OK for trunk?
Ok, thanks.
Jakub