This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
> If I remove the previously installed gcc, the failure again occurs. > So, it looks like the testsuite is picking up installed *.mod files > over the freshly built *.mod files. This is not a showstopper. And this is not all the testsuite, but only ieee_1.F90. After a long chase, it turns out it’s because it has a dg-options, which overrides my IEEE options in ieee.exp. This is because I used dg-options when I should have used dg-additional-options (phew!). Attached is an updated test gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_1.F90, please check that it also fixes the spurious errors with non-installed module files. > I also read through the config/fpu-sysv.h diff. It looks correct > to me. I do note that I suspect that there is a problem in > config/fpu-sysv.h. I concur with your diagnosis. I’ve fixed this, and full new patch is attached (including regenerated files). > Both Janne and Tobias have stated that they took a quick glance > over the patch, and with my testing I think you should commit. > Although you'll probably need to deal with other odd architectures. I’ll wait a few more days to commit, so others can comment/review and I am sure to be around if there is fallout. Thanks again for your help! FX
Attachment:
ieee_1.F90
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
ieee_3.diff
Description: Binary data
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |