Re: is valid this use of forall

[Tim Prince <n8tm at aol dot com>]

On 05/28/2013 06:41 PM, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> I get
>
>   forall:            1 do:           5
>   forall:            0 do:           0
>   forall:            0 do:           0
>   forall:            0 do:           0
>   forall:            0 do:           0
>
> with gfortran 4.5.4, but the infinite loop with 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, and trunk.
>
> The changed occured between revisions 162456 (2010-07-23: stop) and
> 1635293 (2010-08-24: infinite loop). I don't see why your use of FORALL
> would be invalid, but I may miss some fine prints.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dominique
Adams, Brainerd et al "Fortran 2003 Handbook" say specifically it's not 
valid when there are repeated indices.  In the intended use as a 
parallel assignment, no notice need be taken of multiple assignments to 
an element.

--
Tim Prince