This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch, fortran] Handle -Wextra, -fcompare-reals is implied with -Wextra

From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at netcologne dot de>
To: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 07:34:36 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch, fortran] Handle -Wextra, -fcompare-reals is implied with -Wextra
References: <505F69DF.5090706@netcologne.de> <CAESRpQCiExgwzgo1yyP+cfcejtOn7ns7BejvF8LH98PDFYROvw@mail.gmail.com>

Am 23.09.2012 23:46, schrieb Manuel López-Ibáñez:

However, the
actual problem seems to be that gfortran uses their own option
variables and not the ones generated by the common machinery (which
are generated in any case, so it is a bit of a waste to duplicate
them).

It is up to the gfortran maintainers to enforce using the common
machinery or keep re-inventing the wheel.


I have submitted PR 54687 to track this issue.  Maybe somebody
from inside (or outside :-) the gfortran maintainer community
has time to work on it.

Thomas

References:
- [patch, fortran] Handle -Wextra, -fcompare-reals is implied with -Wextra
  - From: Thomas Koenig
- Re: [patch, fortran] Handle -Wextra, -fcompare-reals is implied with -Wextra
  - From: Manuel López-Ibáñez

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]