This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: .f90 runs slower than .f


Oops, sorry about that (and the delay replying!)

I have removed all reference to the FoXML module and it compiles fine on my computer. It does need fftw which I can't really get rid of (I won't be able to tell if it is giving the right answer), that seems to be fairly standard though. Removing FoX made no difference to the timings.

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/70250131/gauge_field_v0.44-gfortrancheck.tar.bz2

Extract and do make NRQCDf77 or NRQCDf90 and just run with
time ./NRQCDf77
or
time ./NRQCDf90

Thanks
Rachel


On 04/08/12 02:03, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:41:07AM +0100, Rachel Dowdall wrote:
It would help enormously if you would provide a driver main program so
that we can test your assertion.
I have put a tar file of my code in my dropbox:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/70250131/gauge_field_v0.44-gfortrancheck.tar.bz2

Unfortunately, your application, or at least your makefile,
needs something called FoX.  Have not idea that that is.



--
===================================
Dr Rachel Dowdall
School of Physics and Astronomy
University of Glasgow
Glasgow G12 8QQ
email: Rachel.Dowdall@glasgow.ac.uk
tel: +44 141 330 3770
===================================


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]