This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: .f90 runs slower than .f

From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
To: Rachel Dowdall <Rachel dot Dowdall at glasgow dot ac dot uk>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 18:03:59 -0700
Subject: Re: .f90 runs slower than .f
References: <501AAC36.9050105@glasgow.ac.uk> <CAGkQGiL7FOrn09em_czczHXen3K1UpxX9fRTxdWQn6a8ssTweA@mail.gmail.com> <501BAAC3.8070806@glasgow.ac.uk>

On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:41:07AM +0100, Rachel Dowdall wrote:
> 
> >It would help enormously if you would provide a driver main program so
> >that we can test your assertion.
> I have put a tar file of my code in my dropbox:
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/70250131/gauge_field_v0.44-gfortrancheck.tar.bz2
> 

Unfortunately, your application, or at least your makefile,
needs something called FoX.  Have not idea that that is.

-- 
steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: .f90 runs slower than .f
  - From: Stephen Bespalko
- Re: .f90 runs slower than .f
  - From: Rachel Dowdall

References:
- .f90 runs slower than .f
  - From: Rachel Dowdall
- Re: .f90 runs slower than .f
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas
- Re: .f90 runs slower than .f
  - From: Rachel Dowdall

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]