This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi all,If it is possible to get computational results that are incorrect without realizing it then I think there is a strong case for back port.
if the RHS is an array constructor, gfortran didn't deep copy allocatable components. That was fixed for the trunk by the patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-06/msg00095.html
The wrong-code issue is not a regression and code leading to the bug seems to be sparse, judging how many compilers are affected by the bug (cf. PR).
Nethertheless, I am considering to backport it to 4.6. One could also backport it to 4.5 or even 4.4.
What do you think?
Tobias
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |