This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: For testing: full __float128 patch


On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 09:25:42PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >>> I'm not familiar in versioning stuff, but since soft-fp symbols are
> >>> part of generic libgcc-std.ver for a long time (before 4.5.0), I
> >>> believe, it is enough to patch only configure files (see i.e. commits
> >>> that enabled soft-fp on mingw/cygwin/-gnu*).
> >>
> >> It will "work", but not properly. ?One should never have symbols
> >> magically appear in old versions. ?If you add the symbols to the
> >> proper current version number in a config/gcc/i386/libgcc-bsd.ver,
> >> they'll appear at the right place.
> >
> > Can someone please help here?
> 
> Attached is my best (untested) shot at libgcc-bsd.ver. Someone has to
> write i386/t-freebsd (similar to i386/t-linux) and connect it to the
> build system. The versioning assumes that this will be committed to
> 4.5.x first.

It is wrong, GCC 4.5.0 has been released already, so no new symbols should
be added to GCC_4.5.0 symver.
IMNSHO this isn't a regression fix, so you should just apply it to the
trunk, and introduce them as GCC_4.6.0 version.  Also, there is no need
to have two chunks for the same symver in the *.ver file, just put the
3 resp. 2 symbols before the preceeding closing brace, together with the
%ifdef/%else/%endif.

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]