This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, libgfortran] PR 40190 DATE_AND_TIME not thread-safe

From: FX <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
To: Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist dot janne at gmail dot com>
Cc: Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 15:01:32 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch, libgfortran] PR 40190 DATE_AND_TIME not thread-safe
References: <EFC9A544-F9EC-416C-B76E-B98F90BD7078@gmail.com> <7b446c2e0905220340p43904afaxb1b13b7e0454f187@mail.gmail.com>

So a modified form of the original question,
do we have a target 1) where we support OpenMP  2) doesn't have
localtime_r and gmtime_r nor threadsafe localtime and gmtime ?

Looking at libgomp/configure.tgt, I suppose the answer currently is "no".

FX

References:
- Re: [Patch, libgfortran] PR 40190 DATE_AND_TIME not thread-safe
  - From: FX
- Re: [Patch, libgfortran] PR 40190 DATE_AND_TIME not thread-safe
  - From: Janne Blomqvist

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]