This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Possible Buglet in gfortran Release 143193 (and 4.3.1 and 4.3.2)

From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
To: Tom Browder <tom dot browder at gmail dot com>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:13:34 -0800
Subject: Re: Possible Buglet in gfortran Release 143193 (and 4.3.1 and 4.3.2)
References: <8bc817ee0901231615o7dc5e86cp33b4aa9ca1ed5d70@mail.gmail.com> <20090124012542.GA57389@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <8bc817ee0901231802s4a55b7fdie55bf9f45c9844d0@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 08:02:45PM -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Steve Kargl
> <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> > A semicolon as it appears above is legal.
> >
> > See Sections 3.3.1.2 and 3.3.2.2 of the Fortran 95 standard.
> 
> But is that permitted in a Fortran 77 program?  I guess gfortran has
> no check for the f77 standard itself anymore.

It is not legal in Fortran 77.

Gfortran is a Fortran 95 compiler with many Fortran 2003 and
2008 features.  gfortran does not have a -std=f77 mode.  Such
a mode would be a rather questionable step backwards.

-- 
Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Possible Buglet in gfortran Release 143193 (and 4.3.1 and 4.3.2)
  - From: Tom Browder

References:
- Possible Buglet in gfortran Release 143193 (and 4.3.1 and 4.3.2)
  - From: Tom Browder
- Re: Possible Buglet in gfortran Release 143193 (and 4.3.1 and 4.3.2)
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: Possible Buglet in gfortran Release 143193 (and 4.3.1 and 4.3.2)
  - From: Tom Browder

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]