This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Precision problem

From: Craig Powers <enigma at hal-pc dot org>
To: GCC Fortran mailing list <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:44:00 -0400
Subject: Re: Precision problem
References: <849364920807081751l5ede3cd1v73f99a5b48575917@mail.gmail.com> <48743F24.6030403@sbcglobal.net> <849364920807082136o2abf5235mec2b0ffbf8672c08@mail.gmail.com> <48744F93.2070806@sbcglobal.net> <849364920807091101s53b59cf2m548adc346bbb2aff@mail.gmail.com>

Matt Hauer wrote:


      SUBROUTINE GenerateMeasurementEquations(nG, nB, E, RecV, &
        delta, h_meas, E_gen, theta, V)
        IMPLICIT NONE
        INTEGER, INTENT(IN) :: nG, nB
        REAL(8), INTENT(IN), DIMENSION(nG) :: E
        REAL(8), INTENT(IN), DIMENSION(nG) :: delta
        COMPLEX*16, INTENT(IN), DIMENSION(nB, nG) :: RecV

You've confirmed that these are all full-precision values on entry into the routine? (i.e. no issues with assignment of a single-precision value into a double-precision variable)

References:
- Precision problem
  - From: Matt Hauer
- Re: Precision problem
  - From: Tim Prince
- Re: Precision problem
  - From: Tim Prince
- Re: Precision problem
  - From: Matt Hauer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]