This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:56:56 +0100 "François-Xavier Coudert" wrote: > > We had some discussion a while back about where to put module files > (thread starting at > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-11/msg00516.html), but a conclusion > was easier to reach because we were only dealing with gfortran > intrinsic (or "internal") module files, so we ended up hidding them > inside the gcc directories > (/usr/lib*/gcc/${target}/${version}/finclude). For the naming, there > was a general agreement about "finclude" (with F for Fortran). A > minority was leaning towards "mod" or "modules", which is more correct > from the Fortran point of view (these files are module files, and are > not "included" in the Fortran terminology), but then there is a risk > of confusion with other meanings for modules (kernel modules, or > whatever). > > Now, my personnal opinion is that since these files are > compiler-generated and target-dependent, they are very similar to > libraries. For that reason, I think they probably should be placed in > /usr/lib*/finclude, or in /usr/finclude*, where * can be 32, 64 or > nothing. Many thanks to everyone who responded. The thread FX referenced (above) is a good read. It would be easier if the FHS provided more guidance but I suppose (?) they are mostly trying to document existing conventions, not create them anew. Thanks again! Ed -- Edward H. Hill III, PhD | ed@eh3.com | http://eh3.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |