This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Buffered/unbuffered I/O issues

From: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>
To: Harald Anlauf <anlauf at gmx dot de>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:33:04 -0700
Subject: Re: Buffered/unbuffered I/O issues
References: <20071016142434.247130@gmx.net> <19c433eb0710160734m314e3194y9f614786b9cd0a5a@mail.gmail.com>

François-Xavier Coudert wrote:

% echo $GFORTRAN_UNBUFFERED_6
1
% echo $GFORTRAN_UNBUFFERED_ALL


Currently, GFORTRAN_UNBUFFERED_ALL is implemented but
GFORTRAN_UNBUFFERED_n (where n is not ALL) isn't. This should either
be implemented, or the documentation for that feature should be
removed (as well as the unused code providing  partial support for
it). I think the second choice is simplest, because 1. people who want
unbuffered output can use GFORTRAN_UNBUFFERED_ALL, and 2. if they
really need partial unbuffered output, they can use FLUSH.

FX

What do you think about providing GFORTRAN_UNBUFFERED_STDIO rather than the more general _n?

Herald, what are your needs?

Jerry

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Buffered/unbuffered I/O issues
  - From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: Buffered/unbuffered I/O issues
  - From: Harald Anlauf

References:
- Buffered/unbuffered I/O issues
  - From: Harald Anlauf
- Re: Buffered/unbuffered I/O issues
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]