This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [libgfortran,patch] Use __mingw_snprintf instead of snprintf when possible
- From: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
- Cc: 'François-Xavier Coudert' <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>, 'GFortran' <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, 'gcc-patches' <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 10:21:06 +0200
- Subject: Re: [libgfortran,patch] Use __mingw_snprintf instead of snprintf when possible
- References: <000601c7e503$fe24ddc0$ba4861cb@THOMAS>
:REVIEWMAIL:
Danny Smith wrote:
>> Built and tested (but not regtested, as it requires a very weird setup
>> on mingw) on i386-pc-mingw32, OK to commit?
>>
> How 'weird'? Regtested on native build of mingw32 (using cygwin's
> dejagnu support) with no new regressions.
> I have no objections.
>
Looks almost trivial and as the mingw maintainer has no objections:
OK.
Thanks for the fix!
Tobias
PS: Anyone interested in doing some reviews? Outstanding are:
USE operator patch by me:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01081.html
-frecursive/OpenMP patch by Asher and me:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01253.html
COMMON checking patch by me:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01299.html
GAMMA/LGAMMA patch by me:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01386.html
And, awaiting review for a long time, Thomas' byte-wise access to masks
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01468.html