This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Win32 vs CentOS5

From: Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>
To: RadSurfer <RadSurfer at yahoo dot com>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 08:48:43 -0700
Subject: Re: Win32 vs CentOS5
References: <loom.20070819T154143-105@post.gmane.org>

RadSurfer wrote:

Sun Aug/19/07 231 07:53:17

Comparison of Win32 Console version of `gfortran` to CentOS 5 linux:
(if you view this article within 24 hours of its posting, the following
 pastebin should be valid, if you wish to view the actual source:
 http://rafb.net/p/MDDhWI90.html)

e:\gfortran\test>gfortran uc.f95
e:\gfortran\test>dir
 Directory of  E:\gfortran\test\*
 8-19-2007  7:45    <DIR>    .
 8-19-2007  7:45    <DIR>    ..
 8-19-2007  7:48  1,213,085  a.exe   [a.out is 13,474 bytes under linux]
 8-18-2007 17:33      1,440  uc.f95  [identical source code  ]
 8-19-2007  7:46         56  uconv.log
      1,214,581 bytes in 3 files and 2 dirs    1,224,704 bytes allocated
  1,189,318,656 bytes free

e:\gfortran\test>strip a.exe
e:\gfortran\test>dir a.exe
 8-19-2007   7:50         114,688  a.exe                     [ouch!]

--- snip ---

The Win32 version of gfortran has been configured to not support shared libraries. In other words, the run time functions are included in the executable. The Linux version is linking to the library at run time, dynamically.

Jerry

References:
- Win32 vs CentOS5
  - From: RadSurfer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]