This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: fixing PR32765

From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
To: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>
Cc: GNU Fortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 23:17:56 +0100
Subject: Re: fixing PR32765
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=Ldn+us+RCDS3aZZsiqC008m/JiC2YUPAQa/gb9ntjTIdP0B+0xj8JBy0wTcy05gLZBiu2Q+UmoXG3NBhULULQbFFbYk2HRllGm5bN4WJwkRXTxj6dlLkNCONOx3LUrwJiqp38a7OIkg0KPJ+rGcfzL/8GaNg3/zBqZXIcPGcxhs=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=Oag+w1WV33TbV70tzBu34di0P18MEVTRxKQg66LMZZUd7wJLgucUiLmg5Nu2jV00kM24UERu1zQ0L9gLSnIljgVyOUNIjXw3NNedztKmrisbwWQVl14cPzacnrbT3rc6tSoUSzs9dkos9AiuKuBnIGZSY5eLp9rQAkJ8hfdD93s=
References: <20070810215152.GA21279@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>

   Mike Stump looked at PR32765 and suggested several
ways to fix it. On the link line for the failing tests
libgomp.fortran/pr32550.f90 and libgomp.fortran/crayptr2.f90
we can either use -static-libgcc, -lgcc_s or libgomp.a.

The question is: isn't that just a workaround? What happens to people who want to try this kind of code? Why do they have to link to a static libgcc?

FX

References:
- fixing PR32765
  - From: Jack Howarth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]