This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: RECURSIVE vs PURE and ELEMENTAL
Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> ...
> Walter, I had not heard the cygwin gfortran binary on the wiki was broken. I
> will try to check on it later today. I also need to build a new one.
What Intel processor do you target the cygwin binary for? My home machine
is a lowly P-III (in a SGI 320 Visual Workstation.) By the naming convention
of i686, would one be correct to think the provided cygwin binaries would
support anything from P-II onwards?
W.