This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is this a known optimisation bug ? (Which has appeared recently...)

From: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
To: Benjamin Réveillé <benjamin dot reveille at gmail dot com>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 00:14:36 +0100
Subject: Re: Is this a known optimisation bug ? (Which has appeared recently...)
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=CfQ2VAs4mNign2yePbaEFsUmvAO1SxcU7Hl/xZDyj01d9ZT6CY32qT41zOtEaJcUPnjPigCPBuGeoKkxiRmztpoKbZRcRUoSA/Ph1mfP3sR44WKjsOHs/+PwsYNPZnZinwmgOzMf+CSdKiH5nwK1kycufNYUlEhaiu9w3ptc6lM=
References: <200701260005.45532.benjamin.reveille@gmail.com>

bugOpti.f90: In function 'MAIN__':
bugOpti.f90:6: erreur interne du compilateur: dans operand_equal_p, à
fold-const.c:2540

It's a known bug, #30391. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ show_bug.cgi?id=30391 for more details, and you can add yourself to the CC list of that bug report if you wish to gently suggest to the person "owning" this bug that people are actively waiting for this one to be fixed! (you won't be alone there, as you can see).

Veuillez soumettre un rapport complet d'anomalies,
avec le source pré-traité si nécessaire.

Why on earth do people feel necessary to translate every single technical word into a weird french term nobody ever uses? What is the preprocessor, then: "un pré-traiteur"?

FX

References:
- Is this a known optimisation bug ? (Which has appeared recently...)
  - From: Benjamin RÃveillÃ

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]