This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: question on bind(c) global vars

From: "Christopher D. Rickett" <crickett at lanl dot gov>
To: "Brooks Moses" <bmoses at stanford dot edu>
Cc: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>, crickett at lanl dot gov, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:09:09 -0700 (MST)
Subject: Re: question on bind(c) global vars
References: <19175.128.165.0.81.1168650623.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <21675.128.165.0.81.1168653807.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> <20070113032640.pdq1rjaeosk0400o@webmail.physik.uni-muenchen.de> <20070112184639.L18532@droplet.stanford.edu>
Reply-to: crickett at lanl dot gov

>
> Yes, that should definitely be "cannot".
>
> The rule to remember is "Don't use 'can not'."  :)
>
> The more precise explanation is that, if you use "can not", it looks
> like it means "it's possible for this not to be bind(C)" -- which
> generally implies that it's also true that it "can be bind(C)", too.
>

i'll try to make sure i change that before submitting the patch.  thanks.
Chris

References:
- question on bind(c) global vars
  - From: Christopher D. Rickett
- Re: question on bind(c) global vars
  - From: Christopher D. Rickett
- Re: question on bind(c) global vars
  - From: Tobias Schlüter
- Re: question on bind(c) global vars
  - From: Brooks Moses

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]