This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR23232 - DATA implied DO variables

From: "Paul Richard Thomas" <paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com>
To: "Steve Kargl" <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 07:55:50 +0100
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR23232 - DATA implied DO variables
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=c3xV2+QQkwO4dpBb4GKneYtcP6NO/EWDn3nI0YMG2vLcx/lACExV2rePgZ+iNse77eCcmLbvVWJyKnVzl5sauoISJmEh0+2Gt6j0WXtZWHE45zsT3lw99KTkAcMtCu7b7jhUe1A3He8TLg2+v4vHHYgTFqOMuYfAAj7FRK2qRKM=
References: <339c37f20701040734v1b09077ek100989c8bb73e6f2@mail.gmail.com> <339c37f20701040742p879203bxb8e05e6f49f32b71@mail.gmail.com> <20070105061219.GA43628@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

Steve,

Paul, I believe the patch is ok with one comment below.
Do you want me to commit it for you?


Thanks for the offer but I can do it - I have programmed a series of
slots to commit the stragglers.

If we return here, do we need to free start, end, and step?  It
seems to me that this could be a memory leak.

Spot on! I'll correct it.

Thanks

Paul

References:
- [Patch, fortran] PR23232 - DATA implied DO variables
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR23232 - DATA implied DO variables
  - From: Paul Richard Thomas
- Re: [Patch, fortran] PR23232 - DATA implied DO variables
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]