This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Question WRT gfortran.dg/allocatable_function_1.f90

From: erik dot edelmann at iki dot fi
To: Tobias Schl?ter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
Cc: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:29:57 +0200
Subject: Re: Question WRT gfortran.dg/allocatable_function_1.f90
References: <20061125015001.pnm1q4ini880ggk0@webmail.physik.uni-muenchen.de> <20061125162513.GA10340@localhost.dsl.inet.fi> <20061126220218.GA15764@localhost.dsl.inet.fi> <20061127181112.enazmpden4kwok84@webmail.physik.uni-muenchen.de> <20061127194245.GA9935@localhost.dsl.inet.fi>

On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 09:42:45PM +0200, erik.edelmann@iki.fi wrote:
> > ... this sounds like a potentially ugly bug.  Do you think you can  
> > look into this further?
> 
> I'll try to.

First step taken; I've filed a bug report (PR 30003).  Note the excesses we
get with -fbounds-check for this case!

        Erik

References:
- Question WRT gfortran.dg/allocatable_function_1.f90
  - From: Tobias Schlüter
- Re: Question WRT gfortran.dg/allocatable_function_1.f90
  - From: erik . edelmann
- Re: Question WRT gfortran.dg/allocatable_function_1.f90
  - From: erik . edelmann
- Re: Question WRT gfortran.dg/allocatable_function_1.f90
  - From: Tobias Schlüter
- Re: Question WRT gfortran.dg/allocatable_function_1.f90
  - From: erik . edelmann

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]