This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Emacs and GFortran

From: Richard Stallman <rms at gnu dot org>
To: ams at gnu dot org
Cc: stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, eliz at gnu dot org, Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de, wt at atmos dot colostate dot edu, sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu, emacs-devel at gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 01:37:04 -0500
Subject: Re: Emacs and GFortran
References: <E1GfJ99-0001aR-3M@fencepost.gnu.org> <20061102190005.GA6116@meiner.onlinehome.de> <uhcxh61kx.fsf@gnu.org> <200611030143.30545.steven.bosscher@gmail.com> <20061103010817.EA39144018@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE>
Reply-to: rms at gnu dot org

The GFortran maintainers have a valid point that the test suite also
needs to be fixed.  However, instead of demanding that users like you
do all the work, they should be helping to get it done.  For instance,
someone who understands the test suite could look for an equally
simple way to fix that.

References:
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Richard Stallman
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Thomas Koenig
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Alfred M. Szmidt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]