This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Emacs and GFortran

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
To: "Steven Bosscher" <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: ams at gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de, wt at atmos dot colostate dot edu, sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu, emacs-devel at gnu dot org, rms at gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:10:30 +0200
Subject: Re: Emacs and GFortran
References: <E1GfJ99-0001aR-3M@fencepost.gnu.org> <20061102190005.GA6116@meiner.onlinehome.de> <uhcxh61kx.fsf@gnu.org> <200611030143.30545.steven.bosscher@gmail.com> <20061103010817.EA39144018@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <571f6b510611022306y280cabb5ma6bbc408ba4996c9@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>

> Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:06:33 +0100
> From: "Steven Bosscher" <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com>
> Cc: fortran@gcc.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, Thomas.Koenig@online.de, 
> 	wt@atmos.colostate.edu, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, 
> 	emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org
> >
> >    Should gfortran conform to the GNU standards? Preferably yes.  But
> >    if no developer (volunteer!) cares to make it so, tough luck but it
> >    is not going to happen.
> >
> > I volunteered.
> 
> Yes, and that's really sweet of you.

And what is this if not hostility and rudeness towards a volunteer?

References:
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Richard Stallman
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Thomas Koenig
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Alfred M. Szmidt
- Re: Emacs and GFortran
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]