This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gfortran 4.1

From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
To: Warren Turkal <wt at atmos dot colostate dot edu>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 13:15:59 -0700
Subject: Re: gfortran 4.1
References: <200610262110.03243.wt@atmos.colostate.edu> <20061027033510.GA66300@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <200610271632.33727.wt@atmos.colostate.edu>

On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 04:32:33PM -0600, Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Thursday 26 October 2006 21:35, you wrote:
> > If you can't provide a testcase, then I suggest upgrading to
> > a 4.2 or 4.3 compiler.
> 
> I got one of my scientists to provide reduce it. The following ICEs
> on 4.1 and not on 4.2.

Thanks for the testcase.  Is there any possibility that you
can use a 4.2 pre-release version of gfortran?  I suspect
that back porting the fix into 4.1 isn't likely.  There are
too few hacking on the source code.

-- 
Steve

References:
- gfortran 4.1
  - From: Warren Turkal
- Re: gfortran 4.1
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: gfortran 4.1
  - From: Warren Turkal

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]