Re: optimization problems, how to obtain "processed source"?

[Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at verizon dot net>]

Daniel Franke wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> This is a somewhat stupid question, but the manpages are no help here
> (or I can't identify what is needed).
>
> I try to hunt down a problem with optimization. From my tests, it is
> to assume that a variable gets optimized away, that shouldn't. The
> main problem is, that adding WRITEs changes the behaviour of the
> compiled code, therefore I can't use them to debug. My ability to
> decipher assembler is limited, therefore I would like to obtain
> "processed source" as it sometimes added to PRs, e.g. PR29101, comment
> #1 [1]. How can I obtain such "processed sources"? (Is there a proper
> name for this stuff?)
>
> Thanks in advance!
>     Daniel
>
> [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29101#c1
Try -fdump-tree-original for starters.  This is the output before going to the 
next stages.  Then I think there is a -fdump-tree-all which gives a lot of files 
to look at.

There are others here more versed than I in these features who may chime in.

Jerry