This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: Including GMP/MPFR in GCC repository?
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, paul at codesourcery dot com, kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 20:22:25 -0700
- Subject: Re: Including GMP/MPFR in GCC repository?
- Organization: CodeSourcery, Inc.
- References: <Pine.GSO.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
Has there been any thought to including GMP/MPFR in the GCC repository
like we do for zlib and intl?
I do not think we should be including more such packages in the GCC
repository. It's complicated from an FSF perspective and it bloats our
software. GCC is a complicated piece of software, and to build it you
need a lot of stuff installed on your system. I think we should just
accept that. :-)
I think that making our build system more complicated, and adding more
packages, with the goal of making life simpler for people building from
source is deceptive. It doesn't seem particularly harder to build and
install a few libraries and then install GCC. But, making our build
system more complex gives us more ways to make mistakes. It also tempts
us to add lots of configuration options for in-tree and "system"
versions of the libraries, for building but not installing libraries, etc.
I do think we should do is provide a known-good version (whether via a
tag in some version control system, or via a tarball) of these libraries
so that people can easily get versions that work.
(For avoidance of doubt, the above statements are just my opinions as a
GCC developer; they're in no way "official".)
(650) 331-3385 x713