This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [RFC PATCH]: enable building GMP/MPFR in local tree
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, paul at codesourcery dot com, kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org, vincent+gcc at vinc17 dot org
- Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 14:01:41 -0700
- Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH]: enable building GMP/MPFR in local tree
- References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0610081527170.16402@caipclassic.rutgers.edu>
On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 04:42:29PM -0400, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
>
> 3. Assuming we're merciless in requiring an up-to-date version of
> GMP/MPFR in #2, remove hacks in fortran that work around bugs in older
> copies of GMP/MPFR. We can also do this separately after everything
> settles down. Can fortran folks help with this?
Yes, I'll cleanup the Fortran frontend.
> 6. Should we "make check" these two libs? Should we include the results
> in the testsuite reports? I lean towards yes for both, but we don't have
> to solve that right away. It could also be a follow-up
I think that this is a "yes". The gmp wbe page is constantly
warning about build problems with newer gcc.
I can't approve the patch, but I'll test it in the next few days.
--
Steve