This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: segfault with gfortran > 4.0.3
- From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: John Pye <john dot pye at student dot unsw dot edu dot au>, Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>, Arne Drud <info at arki dot dk>
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:54:37 +0200
- Subject: Re: segfault with gfortran > 4.0.3
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id:from; b=Tr5rZdL5sDMCzWmQMAQaNyzQdqPJcwRx2kKkoD+d5YxVieBT4YPpxAaHmJ5jcd7YIH+tbH1goEFrZp2DqlM4f96pTxwxQRqs1X6oeFECfzAs63NtNZ8RrVbU6dsyAFl7Qb1CcmN4xz6pAS7nxLUAIMkF/SL2DfQ8z7z04bJUF7g=
- References: <44CECE54.4060003@student.unsw.edu.au> <20060801035830.GA25544@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <44CEDAEE.5050600@student.unsw.edu.au>
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 06:39, John Pye wrote:
> I do understand that there are issues here with regard to the GNU
> philosophy etc etc, but I also think that I have found a genuine and
> serious bug here that needs to be fixed.
I don't understand why you are even suggesting this would be a "GNU
philosofy etc etc" thing. Anyone who follows cases like SCO vs. IBM
should know that you cannot expect anymore from random hackers of
open source projects to read other people's proprietary code.
Gr.
Steven