This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch,libgfortran & patch,fortran] Namelist (corrected)

From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
To: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Paul Thomas <paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr>, Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 00:00:20 +0200
Subject: Re: [Patch,libgfortran & patch,fortran] Namelist (corrected)
Organization: SUSE Labs
References: <42579BE9.8070500@wanadoo.fr> <42582F5B.7000802@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <42584408.30809@wanadoo.fr>

On Saturday 09 April 2005 23:07, Paul Thomas wrote:
> IS THE CODE FUNCTIONALLY OK?

Yes.

And I think we should maybe be more flexible after 4.0 goes out,
we need this functionality and AFAICT the rest of gfortran is not
perfect, so why should every proposed patch be?  As long as there
is commitment to fix the remaining issues when largish patches
like this one are checked in, we should IMHO just allow stuff in
more quickly.

Gr.
Steven

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch,libgfortran & patch,fortran] Namelist (corrected)
  - From: Bud Davis

References:
- [Patch,libgfortran & patch,fortran] Namelist (corrected)
  - From: Paul Thomas
- Re: [Patch,libgfortran & patch,fortran] Namelist (corrected)
  - From: Tobias Schlüter
- Re: [Patch,libgfortran & patch,fortran] Namelist (corrected)
  - From: Paul Thomas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]