This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: Fallout (mostly runtime library-related) from GCC version numberchange
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > Also libexecsubdir, parts of which get "4.1.0" and parts of which get
> > "const". Does fixincludes/mkheaders.in's definition of libexecsubdir
> > still work after this patch?
>
> No, it doesn't. Good catch, thanks. Is that an installed program?
Yes, it's installed; parts of the code for rerunning fixincludes go in
libsubdir and parts in libexecsubdir.
> > gcc/Makefile.in's
> >
> > "libexecsubdir=$(libsubdir)" \
> >
> > seems dodgy, but this is pre-existing and may be harmless.
>
> The definition of libsubdir in gcc/Makefile.in is already correct.
> (It was being overridden by a bad definition from the top level, though.)
My comment is simply that libexecsubdir != libsubdir so defining one to
the other seems odd. However, I don't think this definition of
libexecsubdir ever actually gets used. Nor does gcc/Makefile.in's
SUBDIR_FLAGS_TO_PASS seem to get used. Given that these definitions don't
seem to be used, they are separate issues.
--
Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
joseph@codesourcery.com (CodeSourcery mail)
jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)