This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: consequence of 4.0 release branch?


François-Xavier Coudert wrote:

What does this mean for testing patches?  Does a fortran patch
require testing for both mainline and the release branch?  I'll

Yes, this is how it's supposed to work for all patches.

I don't know how I feel about that. We're having trouble keeping a minimum speed in fixing gfortran bugs. Basically, double testing will mean greatly diminishing the number of bugs that will get fixed in a given amount of time.

Be careful. You look at the problem from the point of view of someone who recently joined the bug-fixing crowd. In a month's time, the 4.0 branch will be *very* different from mainline. It might be that patches to the front end still apply cleanly, but they might have different effects, exhibit latent bugs, etc.


In the 7 years I've been involved with egcs/gcc development based on CVS, I've *always* tested a patch that worked on mainline against the "branch du jour" of the next release before committing there. It pays in the long run.

--
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
A maintainer of GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]