This is the mail archive of the
fortran@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.
Re: [PATCH] gfortran.dg test harness for gfortran
- From: Tobias dot Schlueter at Physik dot Uni-Muenchen dot DE
- To: "Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)" <david dot billinghurst at comalco dot riotinto dot com dot au>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 13:00:26 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gfortran.dg test harness for gfortran
- References: <8ED2FA87C8ACC04192709688DDFD5F5F09B35B@calttsv025.cal.riotinto.org>
Quoting "Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)"
<david.billinghurst@comalco.riotinto.com.au>:
> Here is the minimal gfortran.dg test harness, adapted from g77.dg.
> I have also christened it by copying one test from g77.dg
>
> I propose that we delete g77.dg/strlen0.f and progressively move
> the working tests from the g77 testsuite into the gfortran testsuite,
> with the aim of eventually deleting the g77 testsuite.
>
> Tested on i686-pc-cygwin
>
Great! Did you try this with a dg-error testcase? I'm curious, because I did the
same AFAICT without diving into the code, but for some reason the regular
expression didn't catch our multi-line error messages -- even after I had
adapted our error printing routines to print file and line like g77 (i.e.
without the leading " In file") -- and therefore those tests failed with
"excess errors".
Thanks,
- Tobi