This is the mail archive of the fortran@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GNU Fortran project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Do we still need libf2c?

From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
To: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 13:54:52 +0200
Subject: Re: Do we still need libf2c?
References: <m3k6yfwxot.fsf@gromit.moeb><200406101250.48879.paul@codesourcery.com>

Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com> writes:

> On Thursday 10 June 2004 10:48, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>> With the merge of tree-ssa and the new fortran frontend, I don't see
>> any reason for libf2c anymore.  Shouldn't we remove it completly from
>> CVS?
>
> I think it's been kept lying around in case anyone wants to recycle it:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-05/msg01073.html

Thanks - somehow I missed that email in my search :-(

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  SUSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Do we still need libf2c?
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: Do we still need libf2c?
  - From: Paul Brook

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]