From 97f8f2d0a0384d377ca46da88495f9a3d18d4415 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jakub Jelinek Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 14:20:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix up *branch_anddi3_dot for -m32 -mpowerpc64 [PR109566] The following testcase reduced from newlib ICEs on powerpc-linux, with -O2 -m32 -mpowerpc64 since r12-6433 PR102239 optimization was added and on the original testcase since some ranger improvements in GCC 13 made it no longer latent on newlib. The problem is that the *branch_anddi3_dot define_insn_and_split relies on the *rotldi3_mask_dot define_insn_and_split being recognized during splitting. The rs6000_is_valid_rotate_dot_mask function checks whether the mask is a CONST_INT which is a valid mask, but *rotl3_mask_dot in addition to checking that it is a valid mask also has (mode == Pmode || UINTVAL (operands[3]) <= 0x7fffffff) test in the condition. For TARGET_64BIT that doesn't add any further requirements, but for !TARGET_64BIT && TARGET_POWERPC64 if the AND second operand is larger than INT_MAX it will not be recognized. The rs6000_is_valid_rotate_dot_mask function is used solely in one spot, condition of *branch_anddi3_dot, so the following patch adjusts it to check for that as well. 2023-04-25 Jakub Jelinek PR target/109566 * config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (rs6000_is_valid_rotate_dot_mask): For !TARGET_64BIT, don't return true if UINTVAL (mask) << (63 - nb) is larger than signed int maximum. * gcc.target/powerpc/pr109566.c: New test. --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc | 11 ++++++++++- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109566.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109566.c diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc index 3be5860dd9b9..6debf0f63ffe 100644 --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc @@ -11409,7 +11409,16 @@ bool rs6000_is_valid_rotate_dot_mask (rtx mask, machine_mode mode) { int nb, ne; - return rs6000_is_valid_mask (mask, &nb, &ne, mode) && nb >= ne && ne > 0; + if (rs6000_is_valid_mask (mask, &nb, &ne, mode) && nb >= ne && ne > 0) + { + if (TARGET_64BIT) + return true; + /* *rotldi3_mask_dot requires for -m32 -mpowerpc64 that the mask is + <= 0x7fffffff. */ + return (UINTVAL (mask) << (63 - nb)) <= 0x7fffffff; + } + + return false; } /* Return whether MASK (a CONST_INT) is a valid mask for any rlwinm, rldicl, diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109566.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109566.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..bfbf92247553 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr109566.c @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +/* PR target/109566 */ +/* Skip this on aix, otherwise it emits the error message like "64-bit + computation with 32-bit addressing not yet supported" on aix. */ +/* { dg-skip-if "" { powerpc*-*-aix* } } */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mpowerpc64" } */ + +void +foo (double x) +{ + union { double d; unsigned i; } u; + u.d = x; + if (u.i & 0x7ff00000) + return; + else + for (;;) + ; +} -- 2.43.5