combine: Don't optimize paradoxical SUBREG AND CONST_INT on WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS...

combine: Don't optimize paradoxical SUBREG AND CONST_INT on WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS targets [PR112758]

As discussed in the PR, the following testcase is miscompiled on RISC-V
64-bit, because num_sign_bit_copies in one spot pretends the bits in
a paradoxical SUBREG beyond SUBREG_REG SImode are all sign bit copies:
5444              /* For paradoxical SUBREGs on machines where all register operations
5445                 affect the entire register, just look inside.  Note that we are
5446                 passing MODE to the recursive call, so the number of sign bit
5447                 copies will remain relative to that mode, not the inner mode.
5448
5449                 This works only if loads sign extend.  Otherwise, if we get a
5450                 reload for the inner part, it may be loaded from the stack, and
5451                 then we lose all sign bit copies that existed before the store
5452                 to the stack.  */
5453              if (WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS
5454                  && load_extend_op (inner_mode) == SIGN_EXTEND
5455                  && paradoxical_subreg_p (x)
5456                  && MEM_P (SUBREG_REG (x)))
and then optimizes based on that in one place, but then the
r7-1077 optimization triggers in and treats all the upper bits in
paradoxical SUBREG as undefined and performs based on that another
optimization.  The r7-1077 optimization is done only if SUBREG_REG
is either a REG or MEM, from the discussions in the PR seems that if
it is a REG, the upper bits in paradoxical SUBREG on
WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS targets aren't really undefined, but we can't
tell what values they have because we don't see the operation which
computed that REG, and for MEM it depends on load_extend_op - if
it is SIGN_EXTEND, the upper bits are sign bit copies and so something
not really usable for the optimization, if ZERO_EXTEND, they are zeros
and it is usable for the optimization, for UNKNOWN I think it is better
to punt as well.

So, the following patch basically disables the r7-1077 optimization
on WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS unless we know it is still ok for sure,
which is either if sub_width is >= BITS_PER_WORD because then the
WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS rules don't apply, or load_extend_op on a MEM
is ZERO_EXTEND.

2023-12-22  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR rtl-optimization/112758
	* combine.cc (make_compopund_operation_int): Optimize AND of a SUBREG
	based on nonzero_bits of SUBREG_REG and constant mask on
	WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS targets only if it is a zero extending
	MEM load.

	* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr112758.c: New test.