When a partial specialization is deemed erroneous at parse time, we
currently flag the primary template as erroneous instead. Later
at instantiation time we check if the primary template is erroneous
rather than the selected partial specialization, so at least we're
consistent.
But it's better not to conflate a partial specialization with the
primary template since they're instantiated independenty. This avoids
rejecting the instantiation of A<int> in the below testcase.
PR c++/116064
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* error.cc (get_current_template): If the current scope is
a partial specialization, return it instead of the primary
template.
* pt.cc (instantiate_class_template): Pass the partial
specialization if any to maybe_diagnose_erroneous_template
instead of the primary template.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/template/permissive-error2.C: New test.
Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
{
if (scope_chain && in_template_context && !current_instantiation ())
if (tree ti = get_template_info (current_scope ()))
- return TI_TEMPLATE (ti);
+ {
+ if (PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_P (TI_TEMPLATE (ti)) && TI_PARTIAL_INFO (ti))
+ ti = TI_PARTIAL_INFO (ti);
+ return TI_TEMPLATE (ti);
+ }
return NULL_TREE;
}
if (! push_tinst_level (type))
return type;
- maybe_diagnose_erroneous_template (templ);
+ maybe_diagnose_erroneous_template (t ? TI_TEMPLATE (t) : templ);
int saved_unevaluated_operand = cp_unevaluated_operand;
int saved_inhibit_evaluation_warnings = c_inhibit_evaluation_warnings;
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/116064
+// { dg-additional-options -fpermissive }
+// Verify we correctly mark a partial specialization as erroneous
+// instead its primary template.
+
+template<class T>
+struct A { };
+
+template<class T>
+struct A<T*> { // { dg-error "instantiating erroneous template" }
+ void f(typename A::type); // { dg-warning "does not name a type" }
+};
+
+A<int> a; // { dg-bogus "" }
+A<int*> b; // { dg-message "required from here" }