re PR other/7350 ('shoud' typos)

* Fix for PR other/7350

[cp]
	* decl.c (duplicate_decls): Fix typo in comment.
[ada]
	* 5qtaprop.adb (Sleep): Fix typo in comment.

From-SVN: r63037

diff --git a/gcc/ada/5qtaprop.adb b/gcc/ada/5qtaprop.adb
index 52c09cff7ec4d8e8a2fdc4c2abc6e7c5fb109c43..988f8ba9e0954c0d9ae645ab19191ea9249255cc 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/ada/5qtaprop.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/5qtaprop.adb
@@ -945,7 +945,7 @@ package body System.Task_Primitives.Operations is
 
       --  Arrange to unlock Self_ID's ATCB lock. The following check
       --  may be unnecessary because the specification of Sleep says
-      --  the caller shoud hold its own ATCB lock before calling Sleep
+      --  the caller should hold its own ATCB lock before calling Sleep
 
       if Self_ID.Common.LL.L.Owner = To_Address (Self_ID) then
          Self_ID.Common.LL.L.Owner := System.Null_Address;

diff --git a/gcc/ada/ChangeLog b/gcc/ada/ChangeLog
index d49ba9dbf6617091f38e953d47e7dc08f861e772..d893cff664586bd1225ab73e722286228caefdb4 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/ada/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ada/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2003-02-18  Ben Elliston  <bje@redhat.com>
+
+       PR other/7350
+       * 5qtaprop.adb (Sleep): Fix typo in comment.
+
 2003-02-04  Joseph S. Myers  <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>
 
        * gnat_rm.texi, gnat_ug.texi: Update to GFDL 1.2.

diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
index 623a127f1395470b5182f3a0bf6dc8054f882a02..c957c261dacbdbcd7c2dc0fe36a8a9b63abdde94 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2003-02-18  Ben Elliston  <bje@redhat.com>
+
+       PR other/7350
+       * decl.c (duplicate_decls): Fix typo in comment.
+
 2003-02-17  Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
 
        PR debug/9717

diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.c b/gcc/cp/decl.c
index fc9051bce94d9fef13761fee1753c7aea69bc75b..82ff6afeabd19a8d7b8c197a68236fdf67779173 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.c
@@ -3543,7 +3543,7 @@ duplicate_decls (tree newdecl, tree olddecl)
        {
          /* If newdecl is not a specialization, then it is not a
             template-related function at all.  And that means that we
-            shoud have exited above, returning 0.  */
+            should have exited above, returning 0.  */
          my_friendly_assert (DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION (newdecl),
                              0);