+2000-07-25 Zack Weinberg <zack@wolery.cumb.org>
+
+ * cpplib.c (_cpp_check_directive): Issue -Wtraditional
+ warnings for indented directives even if we are skipping.
+
2000-07-25 Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
* invoke.texi (strict-prototypes): Remove.
for (i = 0; i < N_DIRECTIVES; i++)
if (pfile->spec_nodes->dirs[i] == token->val.node)
{
+ /* In -traditional mode, a directive is ignored unless its #
+ is in column 1. In code intended to work with K+R compilers,
+ therefore, directives added by C89 must have their # indented,
+ and directives present in traditional C must not. This is true
+ even of directives in skipped conditional blocks. */
+ if (CPP_WTRADITIONAL (pfile))
+ {
+ if (!bol && dtable[i].origin == KANDR)
+ cpp_warning (pfile,
+ "traditional C ignores #%s with the # indented",
+ dtable[i].name);
+
+ if (bol && dtable[i].origin != KANDR)
+ cpp_warning (pfile,
+ "suggest hiding #%s from traditional C with an indented #",
+ dtable[i].name);
+ }
+
/* If we are skipping a failed conditional group, all non-conditional
directives are ignored. */
if (pfile->skipping && !(dtable[i].flags & COND))
return 0;
- /* In -traditional mode, a directive is ignored unless its #
- is in column 1. */
- if (!bol && dtable[i].origin == KANDR && CPP_WTRADITIONAL (pfile))
- cpp_warning (pfile, "traditional C ignores #%s with the # indented",
- dtable[i].name);
-
/* Issue -pedantic warnings for extended directives. */
if (CPP_PEDANTIC (pfile) && dtable[i].origin == EXTENSION)
cpp_pedwarn (pfile, "ISO C does not allow #%s", dtable[i].name);
- /* -Wtraditional gives warnings about directives with inappropriate
- indentation of #. */
- if (bol && dtable[i].origin != KANDR && CPP_WTRADITIONAL (pfile))
- cpp_warning (pfile,
- "suggest hiding #%s from traditional C with an indented #",
- dtable[i].name);
-
return &dtable[i];
}