Do not specify NAN sign in frange::set_nonnegative.

After further reading of the IEEE 754 standard, it has become clear
that there are no guarantees with regards to the sign of a NAN when it
comes to any operation other than copy, copysign, abs, and negate.

Currently, set_nonnegative() is only used in one place in ranger
applicable to floating point values, when expanding unknown calls.
Since we already specially handle copy, copysign, abs, and negate, all
the calls to set_nonnegative() must be NAN-sign agnostic.

The cleanest solution is to leave the sign unspecificied in
frange::set_nonnegative().  Any special case, must be handled by the
caller.

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* value-range.cc (frange::set_nonnegative): Remove NAN sign handling.
	(range_tests_signed_zeros): Adjust test.

diff --git a/gcc/value-range.cc b/gcc/value-range.cc
index 852ac09f2c46323d7eae7a7b9ff4331747301594..d55d85846c1e756ca85333062885312202389443 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/value-range.cc
+++ b/gcc/value-range.cc
@@ -797,14 +797,17 @@ frange::zero_p () const
          && real_iszero (&m_max));
 }
 
+// Set the range to non-negative numbers, that is [+0.0, +INF].
+//
+// The NAN in the resulting range (if HONOR_NANS) has a varying sign
+// as there are no guarantees in IEEE 754 wrt to the sign of a NAN,
+// except for copy, abs, and copysign.  It is the responsibility of
+// the caller to set the NAN's sign if desired.
+
 void
 frange::set_nonnegative (tree type)
 {
   set (type, dconst0, frange_val_max (type));
-
-  // Set +NAN as the only possibility.
-  if (HONOR_NANS (type))
-    update_nan (/*sign=*/false);
 }
 
 // Here we copy between any two irange's.  The ranges can be legacy or
@@ -3923,7 +3926,6 @@ range_tests_signed_zeros ()
     ASSERT_TRUE (r0.undefined_p ());
 
   r0.set_nonnegative (float_type_node);
-  ASSERT_TRUE (r0.signbit_p (signbit) && !signbit);
   if (HONOR_NANS (float_type_node))
     ASSERT_TRUE (r0.maybe_isnan ());
 }