"r<noxa>sbg\t%0,%1,%<bfstart>2,%<bfend>2,%3"
[(set_attr "op_type" "RIE")])
+;; These two are generated by combine for s.bf &= val.
+;; ??? For bitfields smaller than 32-bits, we wind up with SImode
+;; shifts and ands, which results in some truly awful patterns
+;; including subregs of operations. Rather unnecessisarily, IMO.
+;; Instead of
+;;
+;; (set (zero_extract:DI (reg/v:DI 50 [ s ])
+;; (const_int 24 [0x18])
+;; (const_int 0 [0]))
+;; (subreg:DI (and:SI (subreg:SI (lshiftrt:DI (reg/v:DI 50 [ s ])
+;; (const_int 40 [0x28])) 4)
+;; (reg:SI 4 %r4 [ y+4 ])) 0))
+;;
+;; we should instead generate
+;;
+;; (set (zero_extract:DI (reg/v:DI 50 [ s ])
+;; (const_int 24 [0x18])
+;; (const_int 0 [0]))
+;; (and:DI (lshiftrt:DI (reg/v:DI 50 [ s ])
+;; (const_int 40 [0x28]))
+;; (subreg:DI (reg:SI 4 %r4 [ y+4 ]) 0)))
+;;
+;; by noticing that we can push down the outer paradoxical subreg
+;; into the operation.
+
+(define_insn "*insv_rnsbg_noshift"
+ [(set (zero_extract:DI
+ (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "+d")
+ (match_operand 1 "const_int_operand" "")
+ (match_operand 2 "const_int_operand" ""))
+ (and:DI
+ (match_dup 0)
+ (match_operand:DI 3 "nonimmediate_operand" "d")))
+ (clobber (reg:CC CC_REGNUM))]
+ "TARGET_Z10
+ && INTVAL (operands[1]) + INTVAL (operands[2]) == 64"
+ "rnsbg\t%0,%3,%2,63,0"
+ [(set_attr "op_type" "RIE")])
+
+(define_insn "*insv_rnsbg_srl"
+ [(set (zero_extract:DI
+ (match_operand:DI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "+d")
+ (match_operand 1 "const_int_operand" "")
+ (match_operand 2 "const_int_operand" ""))
+ (and:DI
+ (lshiftrt:DI
+ (match_dup 0)
+ (match_operand 3 "const_int_operand" ""))
+ (match_operand:DI 4 "nonimmediate_operand" "d")))
+ (clobber (reg:CC CC_REGNUM))]
+ "TARGET_Z10
+ && INTVAL (operands[3]) == 64 - INTVAL (operands[1]) - INTVAL (operands[2])"
+ "rnsbg\t%0,%4,%2,%2+%1-1,%3"
+ [(set_attr "op_type" "RIE")])
+
(define_insn "*insv<mode>_mem_reg"
[(set (zero_extract:W (match_operand:QI 0 "memory_operand" "+Q,S")
(match_operand 1 "const_int_operand" "n,n")