gimple_ranger::update_stmt has no idea what the context of an update
is, and should not be adding relations when it re-evaluates a stmt.
PR tree-optimization/107523
gcc/
* gimple-range.cc (gimple_ranger::update_stmt): Use fur_stmt
rather than fur_depend.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/pr107523.c: New.
// Re-calculate a new value using just cache values.
Value_Range tmp (TREE_TYPE (lhs));
fold_using_range f;
- fur_depend src (s, &(gori ()), &m_cache);
+ fur_stmt src (s, &m_cache);
f.fold_stmt (tmp, s, src, lhs);
// Combine the new value with the old value to check for a change.
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 " } */
+
+int a, b = 1;
+unsigned int c = 1;
+int main() {
+ int d = 1, f;
+ if (b)
+ d = 0;
+ a = -1;
+ b = ~d ^ 465984011;
+ L1:;
+ if (b < 2)
+ f = b;
+ b = f;
+ if (f <= a) {
+ int g = -(a && 1), h = g - f && a, i = ~(c / f) && 1 % (a | h);
+ if (c) {
+ g = f;
+ if (i || (g && (g > -465984012)))
+ goto L2;
+ }
+ c = g | f / c;
+ }
+ if (0)
+ L2:
+ a = 0;
+ if (a <= c)
+ goto L1;
+ return 0;
+}
+