c++: ICE with noexcept and canonical types [PR101715]

This is a "canonical types differ for identical types" ICE, which started
with r11-4682.  It's a bit tricky to explain.  Consider:

  template <typename T> struct S {
    S<T> bar() noexcept(T::value);  // #1
    S<T> foo() noexcept(T::value);  // #2
  };

  template <typename T> S<T> S<T>::foo() noexcept(T::value) {}  // #3

We ICE because #3 and #2 have the same type, but their canonical types
differ: TYPE_CANONICAL (#3) == #2 but TYPE_CANONICAL (#2) == #1.

The member functions #1 and #2 have the same type.  However, since their
noexcept-specifier is deferred, when parsing them, we create a variant for
both of them, because DEFERRED_PARSE cannot be compared.  In other words,
build_cp_fntype_variant's

  tree v = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type);
  for (; v; v = TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT (v))
    if (cp_check_qualified_type (v, type, type_quals, rqual, raises, late))
      return v;

will *not* find an existing variant when creating a method_type for #2, so we
have to create a new one.

But then we perform delayed parsing and call fixup_deferred_exception_variants
for #1 and #2.  f_d_e_v will replace TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS with the newly
parsed noexcept-specifier.  It also sets TYPE_CANONICAL (#2) to #1.  Both
noexcepts turned out to be the same, so now we have two equivalent variants in
the list!  I.e.,

+-----------------+      +-----------------+      +-----------------+
|      main       |      |      #2         |      |      #1         |
| S S::<T379>(S*) |----->| S S::<T37c>(S*) |----->| S S::<T37a>(S*) |----->NULL
|    -            |      |  noex(T::value) |      |  noex(T::value) |
+-----------------+      +-----------------+      +-----------------+

Then we get to #3.  As for #1 and #2, grokdeclarator calls build_memfn_type,
which ends up calling build_cp_fntype_variant, which will use the loop
above to look for an existing variant.  The first one that matches
cp_check_qualified_type will be used, so we use #2 rather than #1, and the
TYPE_CANONICAL mismatch follows.  Hopefully that makes sense.

As for the fix, I didn't think I could rewrite the method_type #2 with #1
because the type may have escaped via decltype.  So my approach is to
elide #2 from the list, so when looking for a matching variant, we always
find #1 (#2 remains live though, which admittedly sounds sort of dodgy).

	PR c++/101715

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* tree.cc (fixup_deferred_exception_variants): Remove duplicate
	variants after parsing the exception specifications.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept72.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept73.C: New test.

diff --git a/gcc/cp/tree.cc b/gcc/cp/tree.cc
index bcd44e739214f9e046fff1ebd35af2adb6ff3e29..f88006aec4fb1f3a1018b46a84f892542511a203 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/cp/tree.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/tree.cc
@@ -2804,8 +2804,9 @@ fixup_deferred_exception_variants (tree type, tree raises)
 
   /* Though sucky, this walk will process the canonical variants
      first.  */
 
   /* Though sucky, this walk will process the canonical variants
      first.  */

+  tree prev = NULL_TREE;

   for (tree variant = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type);
   for (tree variant = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type);

-       variant; variant = TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT (variant))
+       variant; prev = variant, variant = TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT (variant))

     if (TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (variant) == original)
       {
        gcc_checking_assert (variant != TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type));
     if (TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (variant) == original)
       {
        gcc_checking_assert (variant != TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type));


@@ -2815,18 +2816,27 @@ fixup_deferred_exception_variants (tree type, tree raises)
            cp_cv_quals var_quals = TYPE_QUALS (variant);
            cp_ref_qualifier rqual = type_memfn_rqual (variant);
 
            cp_cv_quals var_quals = TYPE_QUALS (variant);
            cp_ref_qualifier rqual = type_memfn_rqual (variant);
 

+           /* If VARIANT would become a dup (cp_check_qualified_type-wise)
+              of an existing variant in the variant list of TYPE after its
+              exception specification has been parsed, elide it.  Otherwise,
+              build_cp_fntype_variant could use it, leading to "canonical
+              types differ for identical types."  */

            tree v = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type);
            for (; v; v = TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT (v))
            tree v = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type);
            for (; v; v = TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT (v))

-             if (TYPE_CANONICAL (v) == v
-                 && cp_check_qualified_type (v, variant, var_quals,
-                                             rqual, cr, false))
-               break;
+             if (cp_check_qualified_type (v, variant, var_quals,
+                                          rqual, cr, false))
+               {
+                 /* The main variant will not match V, so PREV will never
+                    be null.  */
+                 TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT (prev) = TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT (variant);
+                 break;
+               }

            TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (variant) = raises;
 
            if (!v)
              v = build_cp_fntype_variant (TYPE_CANONICAL (variant),
                                           rqual, cr, false);
            TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (variant) = raises;
 
            if (!v)
              v = build_cp_fntype_variant (TYPE_CANONICAL (variant),
                                           rqual, cr, false);

-           TYPE_CANONICAL (variant) = v;
+           TYPE_CANONICAL (variant) = TYPE_CANONICAL (v);

          }
        else
          TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (variant) = raises;
          }
        else
          TYPE_RAISES_EXCEPTIONS (variant) = raises;

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept72.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept72.C
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..f1455b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept72.C
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// PR c++/101715
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template <typename T> struct S {
+  S<T> bar() noexcept(T::value);  // #1
+  S<T> foo() noexcept(T::value);  // #2
+};
+
+template <typename T> S<T> S<T>::foo() noexcept(T::value) {}  // #3
+
+template <typename T> struct S2 {
+  S2<T> bar1() noexcept(T::value);
+  S2<T> bar2() noexcept(T::value);
+  S2<T> bar3() noexcept(T::value);
+  S2<T> bar4() noexcept(T::value);
+  S2<T> bar5() noexcept(T::value);
+  S2<T> baz() noexcept(T::value2);
+  S2<T> foo() noexcept(T::value);
+};
+
+template <typename T> S2<T> S2<T>::foo() noexcept(T::value) {}

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept73.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept73.C
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..24524f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept73.C
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// PR c++/101715
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template <typename T> struct S { };
+
+template<typename T>
+struct A
+{
+    A& foo(A&&) noexcept((S<T>::value));
+    A& assign(A&&) noexcept((S<T>::value));
+};
+template<typename T>
+A<T>& A<T>::foo(A&&) noexcept((S<T>::value)) {}