Merge #780

Merge #780

780: No side effects in 'assert' expressions r=philberty a=tschwinge

Usually, if 'assert'ions are disabled, 'assert' expressions are not evaluated,
so in that case won't effect any side effects.

Via spurious ICEs/test suite FAILs, this may be observed in GCC/Rust, for
example, if configuring with '--enable-checking=no' and disabling a "more
forgiving" 'gcc/system.h:gcc_assert' definition, so that '0 && (EXPR)' gets
used:

     /* Use gcc_assert(EXPR) to test invariants.  */
     #if ENABLE_ASSERT_CHECKING
     #define gcc_assert(EXPR)                                               \
        ((void)(!(EXPR) ? fancy_abort (__FILE__, __LINE__, __FUNCTION__), 0 : 0))
    -#elif (GCC_VERSION >= 4005)
    +#elif (0) //GCC_VERSION >= 4005)
     #define gcc_assert(EXPR)                                               \
       ((void)(__builtin_expect (!(EXPR), 0) ? __builtin_unreachable (), 0 : 0))
     #else
     /* Include EXPR, so that unused variable warnings do not occur.  */
     #define gcc_assert(EXPR) ((void)(0 && (EXPR)))
     #endif

As that one does cause some issues in GCC proper (that I shall fix separately),
may use this change to 'gcc/rust/rust-system.h:rust_assert' instead:

    +#if 0
     #define rust_assert(EXPR) gcc_assert (EXPR)
    +#else
    +#define rust_assert(EXPR) ((void) (0 && (EXPR)))
    +#endif

To fix these, use the same pattern as is already used in a lot of existing
GCC/Rust code:

    bool ok = [expression with side effects];
    rust_assert (ok);

I've only done a quick manual review; maybe there is a tool for doing this?

Co-authored-by: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>